Can Foreign Nationals Start a Business in the US? Here's How

It's based on the arguments for complex equality, which focuses on three key questions:

 My vibe on equality of cultural capital is like totally different from other equality definitions cuz it's all about accepting that there are different vibes in people's lives, not just about fair distribution, but also about a diverse range of criteria. My framework/model like totally vibes with distributive justice as the kind of principle to make sure things are fair and stuff. The model, like, totally rejects the whole idea of one big thing having power over everything else, and it's all about including cultural capital as its own thing, you know? peeps' life, and IDs accommodation as the lit good in that distributive sphere.

The model shows that it's totally possible to flex your cultural capital and achieve overall equality once we've done distributive and social justice in the cultural capital sphere. In like, the model like totally vibes that in order to achieve social and distributive justice, each sphere in people's lives should be independent AF and like governed by different and relevant distributive criteria, you know? According to Walzer, this is like the main vibe behind substantive equality, ya know? In da various spheres, like overall vibe or clout is hella hard to measure 'cause of diff kinds of social goods peeps enjoy, each havin' no common measure wit each other. The vibe is like, 'there's no flex currency to compare money, clout, and influence - you can't really rank people against each other socially' (Miller, 1995: 206). Since everyone's vibe and clout are unique in different areas, the cultural capital they flex can be the way to appreciate their shared wins and success. Thus the argument for complex equality suggests that once justice is done within each particular sphere, it is then possible to achieve overall equality, ya know? OMG, like based on this argument, I've come up with the recognition and protection principle to figure out equality. Lit, right?

OMG, like the migrant farm workers, you know? 

They're totally slaying in the cultural capital game, getting compared and all that. It's so relevant, respect! Yo, like, I've been sayin' all along that we can totally achieve distributive social justice, ya know? 'Cause if we have the power to directly impact how migrants' lives are distributed in terms of jobs, citizenship, and their personal or cultural identity, it won't lead to some unfair social dominance or tyranny, man. In order to achieve mad equality, like according to Walzer’s lit complex equality model, there gotta be a total decline in the hegemony of some peeps or some spheres over others. The vibe of the framework I'm suggesting is like, is the cultural clout of migrant farm workers affected by how other aspects of their lives are spread out? Like, basically, it's all about how much the cultural vibes of migrants are shielded from being taken over by other vibes in their lives, you know? The framework like totally claps back at this argument by flexing a regulative principle so that migrants' equality can't be harmed and like, no sphere of cultural capital gets dominated by the economy or anything else. It's all about keeping it minimal and negligible, fam.The theory vibes with migrant farm workers being part of the minority and having the same flex of cultural capital as the majority peeps. 4 dis reason, my conceptual framework is built on Michael Walzer’s argument 4 da creation of separate spheres 2 ensure justice, within which goods w socially distinct meanings r distributed purely on da basis of relevant criteria designed 4 dose goods.

Cultural cap theory and theory of equality, ya know?

OMG, in this lit research, we're using cultural capital theory and theory of equality (complex equality model under principle of distributive justice) to flex on the contestations of equality and cultural capital for migrant farm workers in Scotland. It's gonna be so fire! I lowkey think that the idea of cultural capital, like, created by Pierre Bourdieu, is, like, a total vibe for studying migrant farm workers and their social and cultural transitions. It helps researchers, you know, think about structures, systems, domination, conflict, policies, practices, and beliefs and stuff. I lowkey show that cultural capital sphere is hella useful for identifying a lit regulatory principle to emerge that deals with migrants' claims from cultural capital. I lowkey think that my theory of distributive justice is all about flexing fair vibes when it comes to sharing the goods and making sure everyone gets their fair share. Equality, ya know?  I lowkey think Walzer's argument for complex equality and his theory of Spheres of Justice is like, the bomb when it comes to repping the right from cultural capital, you know? His model is all about how equality and distributive justice are connected, ya know?