Skip to main content

Strategic Insights Business Recovery in the USA and Canada

If media reports are to be believed, Canadians look to be a particularly unhappy lot right now. The recent bout of inflation and interest rate rises appear to have precipitated a specific phase of economic suffering that has spilled over into personal lives, and that misery appears to be uniform across demographic and socioeconomic categories. According to one survey, financial troubles, inflation, and high interest rates are having an impact on Canadians' mental health, driving concern about housing and food.  Millennials, particularly those who own a home, appear to be the most vulnerable to economic downturns as interest rates rise on tight debt burdens and economic damage wreaks havoc on the economy and expectations. Burdened by debt and rising housing expenses, three-in-ten Canadians are "struggling" to make ends meet, with mortgage holders reporting trouble meeting housing bills up 11% from last June. If you have a place to live, you struggle to pay your bills, and
Post a Comment

From Abroad to America: Opening a US Business as a Foreign Citizen

Recog and protecc principle

 OMG, like equality is sooo important, you know? We gotta figure out how much recognition and protection migrant farm workers deserve, so that their other life stuff doesn't mess with their cultural capital sphere. Walzer's theory of Spheres of Justice is all about that, ya feel me? Under the framework, I've picked 'recognition and protection principle' to talk about the stuff that totally impacts migrant farm workers, like equality and cultural capital. The principle is, like, super important for recognizing and protecting migrants, you know? 


OMG, this is like the total tea on my equality vibes. My idea of cultural capital is all about this lit principle that helps me regulate and handle those claims, you know?
The vibe I'm putting out with this framework is all about giving a solid answer to the lit question on distributive justice. It's like, why should the minority's cultural capital claim be just as legit as the majority's claim? It's all about recognizing and protecting everyone's claims, ya know? It's all about leveling the playing field for everyone, so that every group has a fair shot at getting what they need for the greater good. Like, basically, the principle is all about leveling the cultural vibes of migrant farm workers to match those of the majority peeps. The recog and protec approach that I suggest has two elements, fam. The first one is like, everyone deserves mad respect and protection for their cultural clout. The second one is like, all about equality vibes where everyone, like both the majority and minority peeps, have the same rights, you know? Substantive equality can be like, totally achieved in, like, several ways, you know? Recog is one of them through which the minority can get the same level of protection of their cultural cap as the majority already get. Recognition and protection is like, totally seen as the vibe that supports legit equality. It's like, the idea that I've totally built my own vibe of equality, you know?

The vibe of recognizing and protecting the fact that there's a legit right to acknowledge migrants' resources and stuff sends a major message that needs to be heard: 


there won't be any unfairness or differences in how we distribute and protect people's cultural swag, whether they're part of the majority or the minority. Like, basically, there won't be any diff between how much recognition and protection the majority peeps get from the employer and how much the minority peeps get, you know? This substantive equality is, like, a total vibe that's deeply and firmly established in the principle I'm suggesting, ya know? So, like, if people's cultural capital isn't recognized and protected, it just makes them more vulnerable, ya know? The more peeps don't get recognized for their cultural flex, the more they gonna demand equality, ya feel? Take scholars like Kofman and Raghuram, (2005, 2006), Williams (2006), Mackenzie and Forde (2009); Lawrance (2007), Shiffrin (2006) as examples who have also peeped how and why migrant workers may be vulnerable to being treated badly and used, a lack of recognition for their cultural swag, even though they got enough skills and legit credentials. Shiffrin (2006) has also shown how the decision that devalues migrant farm workers' cultural capital make them feel hella offended and like they're gonna clap back to this non-recognition and expressions of disapproval of their cultural capital which have mad merit or value for them.

The need for recognition and protection of migrants' cultural capital is like, not judged or influenced by migrants' personal vibes or their opinions, ya know? 


OMG, it's like all about where you're at in different areas of life to see how much your cultural vibes are shielded from other vibes, ya know? The more peeps are affected by the non-recognition of their cultural capital and 'by racist labor market structures' (Erel, 2010:642), the more they lack success in other areas, like education and the economy. The recognition and protection principle is, like, all about how much the state cares about a migrant's cultural capital, ya know? It's all about whether there's a difference in how much recognition and protection the majority culture gets compared to the minority culture. It's all about equality, dude. This differentiation could have, like, a major bummer effect on migrants' chances or opportunities for success in other areas of their lives. To flex for that real equality vibe, according to Walzer's theory of Spheres of Justice, you gotta. OMG, like for real, the way migrants get treated is so not cool. They're totally vulnerable and get exploited and stuff. And like, no one even recognizes their skills and resources. It's just messed up, you know? So, they can totally use their cultural capital to make some legit claims, you feel me? Yo, when it comes to this specific claim, like the claim about cultural capital as an equality claim, I'm thinking

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Navigate Office Politics in the USA

It has been infuriating to see folks who answer the cry to "Freedom!" deny that there is any problem worth bothering about. There is nothing small-government about the belief that if there is no problem, the government should do nothing to remedy it. The justification for libertarianism is based on the premise that difficult, important problems require individual effort, creativity, and consensus. Not the assumption that we live in a world free of difficult, important concerns. The polarization of pandemic concerns is so extreme that we can't even agree on what "doing something" and "moving on" look like. Wearing a mask, testing a few times, and working remotely while sick but otherwise returning to normal may qualify as either for the proper person. The inability to agree makes it difficult to be anything but angry with one another. Voluntary replies are good, however they are not adequate. What would have been the libertarian policy response to the p
Post a Comment
Read more

Business Approval Guidelines for US Entrepreneurs

  There are some chances that can help people become legal permanent residents of the United States. If you are a permanent resident, you can live and work in the United States forever. You can also usually work your way up to becoming a citizen. Summary of the Ways Entrepreneurs Can Get Hired in the U.S. Nonimmigrant or Parole (Temporary) Ways To learn more, visit our page on Nonimmigrant or Parole (Temporary) Pathways for Entrepreneur Employment in the United States. Start-up Activity for Pathways in the United StatesHow Long It's Valid IER Rule for International Business Owners The new business must be legally set up and operating in the United States. It must also have been created within five years of your first application. It also needs to have a lot of room for fast growth and job creation. For initial parole you must have substantial ownership, which USCIS defines as at least 10%. For re-parole, you must have substantial ownership of at least 5%. You must be at the cente
Post a Comment
Read more

The Importance of Corporate Strategy in U.S. Business Conduction

The study found a positive correlation between quality management methods, such as quality culture, and organizational learning, as well as information sharing, continuous improvement, and teamwork. Malik and Blumenfeld found that simply implementing quality management principles is insufficient without a leadership commitment to learning, open-mindedness, and shared learning. Business executives must understand the factors that impact employee behavior and habits to ensure quality and compliance with operational standards. To achieve company goals, leaders should establish ways to raise employee awareness of quality and compliance requirements, and encourage them to implement them. The study company was chosen as an example of quality products and a strong Culture of compliance excellence. The study organization used a branded program to integrate product quality and compliance into a holistic strategy that included business, quality, and compliance drivers on a single platform. The
Post a Comment
Read more